The Rolling Stones Drop Their First Album in a Decade — Madonna Won't Let Them Top the Chart

Entertainment232 articles covering this story· 2026-07-09

The Rolling Stones Drop Their First Album in a Decade — Madonna Won't Let Them Top the Chart

The Rolling StonesMick JaggerAlbumKeith RichardsRonnie WoodPaul McCartney
The Rolling Stones Drop Their First Album in a Decade — Madonna Won't Let Them Top the Chart
"Rolling Stones, Charlotte (1972)" by Hunter-Desportes is licensed under CC BY 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/.

The Rolling Stones released *Foreign Tongues*, their twenty-fifth studio album, and by most honest measures it is the most alive thing they have put out in years. It is also, at least for the moment, sitting at No. 2 on the U.K. iTunes Top Albums chart — blocked from the top spot not by a younger rival or a cultural insurgent, but by Madonna, whose *Confessions II: After Hours Edition* currently occupies No. 1 and, in various editions and configurations, fills out much of the top five. The Stones have a second edition of *Foreign Tongues* charting at No. 13. The irony is almost too tidy: rock's most indestructible band, back with a new record, losing a chart race to catalog recycling.

What makes the snub sting a little less is the record itself. *Foreign Tongues* was recorded in roughly a month — a pace that strips out the overthinking that plagued some of the band's more labored later efforts — and the result is loose, confident, and, by several accounts from those who have spent time with it, genuinely funny in places. That is not a word that attaches to Rolling Stones albums very often. Ronnie Wood has described the sessions as a pulling-together after years of the band members working in different directions, crediting Mick Jagger with bringing an energy that men half his age would struggle to sustain in a studio.

Jagger himself, in recent interviews, has been characteristically uninterested in being a spokesman for anything beyond the music. He has said plainly that his job is not to lecture audiences about politics, and that he has no interest in writing songs that function as policy statements. In an era when every artist is expected to have a position on everything, that is either refreshing candor or a convenient dodge, depending on your priors. What it produces, apparently, is a record focused on the thing the Stones have always done better than almost anyone: the friction between people, the comedy of desire, the sound of a band that has been in the same room together long enough to stop pretending.

The album also features a collaboration with Paul McCartney — a fact that lands differently when you hear Keith Richards describe what it meant. Richards has spoken about McCartney's evident joy at simply being in a band context again, at the particular pleasure of playing with other people toward a shared thing. Coming from two men who have spent their entire adult lives at the center of the two greatest rock bands the twentieth century produced, that observation carries weight. McCartney's contribution is not a cameo or a marketing move; by Richards' telling, it is a man rediscovering something he misses.

The sixty-year milestone context is worth pausing on. The band played their first show in 1962, and the distance between that moment and this one contains more music industry upheaval, cultural revolution, and individual catastrophe than most institutions survive intact. They have not survived by staying the same. They have survived, it seems, by staying interested — in each other, in the argument the music is always having with itself, in the question of what the Rolling Stones actually are when they walk into a room together.

The chart situation, meanwhile, is its own small commentary on how the streaming and digital-download era has reshaped what "No. 1" even means. Madonna flooding the top five with multiple editions of the same release is not cheating, exactly — it is playing the rules as written — but it is a reminder that chart positions in 2025 measure catalogue management and release strategy as much as they measure cultural impact. A band releasing one version of one record, made in a month because they wanted to make it, is at a structural disadvantage to an artist releasing five editions of the same project into a fragmented chart.

Fans, for their part, appear to have voted with their attention. In polling among music listeners following the album's release, *Foreign Tongues* was selected as the week's favorite new music — a designation that reflects actual enthusiasm rather than algorithmic chart arithmetic. That gap, between what the charts say and what listeners are actually excited about, is one of the more honest diagnostics of where the music industry sits right now.

At some point in the next week or the next month, the chart will shift again. Madonna's editions will spread thinner, the algorithm will find something new to surface, and *Foreign Tongues* may or may not reach the top spot it is currently denied. What will not change is the stranger fact underneath the chart story: the Rolling Stones made a record that people are genuinely glad exists. After sixty years and twenty-five albums, that is not nothing. That is, actually, the whole thing.

Who is covering this (18+ outlets)

See what people are saying about this story on X.